| (Continued from LIC9099)
Regarding the allegation that facility staff did not follow the terms and conditions of the admission agreement, the Reporting Party specifically alleges that R1 did not receive bathing services regularly. While the Department does have a record of R1’s admission agreement, no other records were collected that could have supported if terms and conditions were or were not being met at the time of the allegation. Per the admission agreement, R1 was being billed the agreed upon amount signed by R1’s responsible party and there were no additional records collected to indicate differently.
Regarding the allegation that R1 did not receive medication as prescribed, records collected revealed all medications as administered per the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for R1.
Regarding the allegation that facility did not meet R1’s needs, there were no records collected to indicate R1’s needs were being neglected by the facility.
Regarding the allegation that R1’s room was not cleaned, observation notes from the LPA who initially opened this complaint observed the facility to be in a clean condition. Upon this date of delivering investigative findings, LPA observed resident bedrooms to be clean and in good repair.
The Department concluded based on available records initially collected, there was no corroborating evidence to support the above mentioned allegations. LPA reviewed facility records of annual inspections and other complaint investigations and did not find any relevant information to support or corroborate these allegations, therefore it is determined that the preponderance of evidence was not met and these allegations are unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Liz Najera, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee’s Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided.
|