1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On July 4, 2024, the ED, DRCS and Wound Specialist all met to discuss R1’s pressure injury and the possibility of it progressing to a worse stage quickly if R1 isn’t seen by medical professionals. R1’s pressure injury wound had eschar (a dry, crusty layer of dead tissue that forms on the surface of a wound, according to the Mayo Clinic) and redness around it, a non-emergency transport was scheduled to take R1 to the hospital for further evaluation.
ED’s interview revealed R1’s responsible party was not pleased with R1 being sent to the hospital. The DRCS reported they discovered R1’s pressure injury got aggressive while R1 was at the hospital, and R1 required a wound vac. After R1’s hospitalization, they did not return to the facility. The Wound Specialist commented that sending R1 to the hospital for evaluation was the right thing to do because if R1 would have remained at the facility, the pressure injury would have gotten worse. The facility was in communication with the hospice agency and followed their direction by seeking professional assistance for R1’s medical care. The facility ensured R1 received required medical treatment for R1’s pressure injury.
Lastly, it was also alleged facility staff did not follow R1’s admission agreement. It was reported R1’s responsible party was being over charged by paying for additional caregivers. Outside source interviews revealed R1’s responsible party was paying for hospice services, private companions 24 hours a day, and extra money for an additional facility staff to be available to assist the private companions, whenever they needed it.
R1’s Admission Agreement dated July 30, 2021, indicated a basic rate with no additional support. The facility issued an Amendment to Resident Service Agreement for Change in Residence dated February 21, 2023. The change reflected R1 required Enhanced Personal Care I with a charge of $1150, in addition to the basic rate. The Admission Agreement reflected Enhanced Personal Care I included hands on assistance with showering more than four times per week, transfer assistance by one (1) staff member and any service included in basic personal care. However, R1 was receiving showers/bathing from hospice agency staff. The ED’s interview revealed R1 was receiving Enhanced Personal Care II, which required a two (2) person assist but the documentation reflected Enhanced Personal Care I. The facility followed the Admission Agreement by providing notice to the resident/responsible party of the increase charge of $1150, which was signed by the responsible party, agreeing to the additional charge.
During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, and records were reviewed. Investigation revealed inconsistent statements and information obtained did not present a preponderance of evidence to support or corroborate the allegations. The allegations are deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Executive Director, Tracy Knepple whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights. [See LIC 811 Confidential Names List to identify Resident #1]
|