1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Lastly, it was alleged the licensee did not arrange appropriate medical care for resident. Outside source interview revealed R1 required a second Covid 19 vaccine and the facility did not arrange appropriate medical care for R1. Executive Director (ED), Inan Linton explained R1 received their first dose of the Pfizer covid-19 vaccine at the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) prior to admission of the facility. However, the SNF could not administer the second dose due to resident receiving a TB test, which was required to be admitted to the facility. R1 was not provided the second does at the facility’s third Covid-19 clinic on 03/06/21, due to being told that R1’s Hospice agency was administering the vaccine. However, hospice never administered the second dose, so the facility was calling around trying to find an appointment.
According to ED Linton they continued to call multiple places and found a superstation in Campo, California, which was 45 minutes away, but the only availability. The Director of Resident Care Services (DRCS) at the time signed R1 up online. During sign-up, it asked which vaccine needed, the DRCS responded, Pfizer, then the appointment was scheduled. The day of the vaccine appoint, the facility provided transportation and R1’s son accompanied them, due to R1 recovering from a fractured back. The driver called ED Linton, while at the superstation that the resident was unable to receive the vaccine as the superstation was only providing Johnson and Johnson vaccines. ED Linton started calling other locations and found one at a nearby licensed facility. The appointment was scheduled and R1’s son accompanied them. When they arrived at the licensed facility, CVS refused to administer the vaccine because they said per CDC guidelines too much time had passed. ED Linton started calling physicians and found one that came to the facility and administered the second dose of the Pfizer vaccine, to R1in their room. Based on ED Linton’s interview they did not arrange appropriate medical care for R1. The DRCS should have confirmed the vaccine being provided before the resident was transported 45 minutes away. Also, ED Linton and/or DRCS should have been aware of the CDC guidelines regarding the Covid 19 vaccination.
Based on interviews which were conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be substantiated. California code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 8, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Executive Director, Tracy Knepple whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.
|