1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued on LIC9099 p.2)
Staff were also spot-trained on a random basis regarding fire emergencies and what to do. Staff provided information regarding the process during emergency procedures, which was consistent with facility records and procedures regarding emergencies.
Resident 1 (R1) was interviewed during an unannounced facility visit. R1 stated that their main concern was what felt like a delay in communication regarding the "all clear", after staff confirmed the incident to be a false alarm. R1 acknowledged that during the time of the incident, staff were assisting all residents in the community, including residents with higher care needs. R1 informed they appreciated their feedback to the facility being taken seriously, and R1 has been involved in updating the resident-facing communication regarding what to do in emergencies.
Records review revealed consistent emergency training conducted by staff annually and monthly, which corroborated staff statements. R1's pendant log showed that R1 received assistance from staff 22 minutes and 30 seconds after pushing their pendant, which was during the false alarm.
During an unannounced facility visit LPA directly observed the location where the fire alarm was pulled, the alarm stations, fire extinguishers, and fire alarms throughout the building. The observations made by LPA were consistent with staff interviews, resident interview, and records reviewed.
Based on interviews, direct LPA observations and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Tracy Knepple, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. |