1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was also alleged that a resident’s dietary needs were not met; specifically, that the facility provided too many sweet items to eat. Interview with other outside sources did not confirm the allegation. Outside sources said that residents ate well at the facility. If a resident did not want to eat what was served, residents had the option to request other food items. If residents preferred a different meal, staff were typically able to accommodate requests. Interview with a staff stated that they were aware that there was one resident who had a dietary restriction and the resident was able to eat menu items or other items requested. Review of records confirmed a resident to have a “controlled diet” of no added salt; however, there were no physician’s orders found that were based on medical necessity. According to residents and outside sources, the facility’s overall meals contained salad and vegetables and a variety of meats served daily. Outside sources did not confirm the meals were too salty or facility served too many sweets.
Lastly, it was alleged that a resident did not have access to a phone at the facility. Interviews with outside sources mentioned most residents have their own cell phones, but if any resident needed to use the facility telephone, they could request to use the telephone and staff would assist them. Interview with additional outside sources revealed there was one inoperable telephone at the facility, but there was a second phone that staff and residents had the ability to use. At times, when the phone was in use, residents would have to wait, but it was mostly available for residents’ use. According to an outside source, residents had not mentioned they had any issues or inconveniences with the telephone use at the facility. In review of records, it was determined that there had been no interruption in telephone service. On October 26, 2022, during facility visit, LPA heard the telephone ring multiple times and staff responded to each phone call.
Based on the Department’s investigation of the above-mentioned allegations and the evidence obtained during staff and outside sources interviews, records reviewed, and LPA observations there is insufficient evidence to meet the preponderance of evidence standard. Therefore, the above allegations are deemed to be unsubstantiated.
The report was discussed, and an exit interview was conducted with Licensee Dobrila Milosavljevic. A copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22) was provided to the Licensee. The Licensee’s signature below serves as confirmation the documents were received. |