1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | income. LPA attempted to interview R1 but was unsuccessful, as they fell asleep due to having a headache. Per the hospice care plan R1 is in their end stage of life and has been given six months left to live. Administrator Dobrilla states that R1 had an increase in their needs. R1 allegedly expressed interest in getting placed on hospice due to having limited funds and needing to assistance with their incontinent supplies. Upon further investigation it was revealed that R1 does in fact have a power of attorney. Their name is indicated on a copy R1’s bank statement, as the beneficiary to be paid upon R1’s death. The Administrator Dobrilla denies having knowledge of this information. On R1s Identification and emergency notification form dated 2/26/19, R1 identified them self as the responsible person for financial affairs but does note the nearest living relative listed who is also their Power of Attorney.
Upon further review R1s Physician Orders for Sustaining Treatment (POLST) dated 12/10/21, revealed that Licensee Miliana Vasic signed stating that she was the Legally recognized Decision maker for R1. In addition to signing the POLST Miliana also signed as the emergency management plan identifying herself as the emergency contact for R1. The form is dated the same day as R1 start of service date for hospice. Based on observation, interview and record review, the allegation of Staff gave consent for resident to receive hospice services, and not the POA is SUBSTANTIATED.
Allegation: Staff gave and signed resident's DNR consent, and not their POA.
Regarding the allegation of staff gave and signed residents’ DNR consent and not their POA. A review of R1’s records revealed that R1 is noted to have begun receiving hospice services on 12/10/2021. Additional documentation revealed that R1 signed their original POLST 10/22/2019, their self. Upon further review in R1s file there is an updated POLST, and the Administrator Miliana Vasic did in fact sign the POLST dated 12/10/2021, identifying herself as the Legally recognized Decision nmaker for R1. Therefore, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A substantiated finding means that the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be Substantiated.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, 9099C, 9099D, and appeal rights were provided to Dobrila Milosavjevic, Administrator. |