1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued from LIC9099 3 of 3) On January 28, 2026, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the facility does not provide quality food. During the visit, the LPA observed a scheduled meal service and reviewed posted menus. Observations showed the menu aligned with these required regulations listing balanced offerings and noting alternatives for residents with preferences or dietary restrictions. Meals appeared palatable and were served at appropriate temperatures, and staff were observed following sanitary practices. The dining environment was orderly, with residents receiving assistance as needed and opportunities to request substitutions. A review of facility records indicated that menus were planned in advance and reflected seasonal diets. Kitchen temperature logs and maintenance records showed refrigerator and hot
holding equipment within safe ranges, and staff training files documented completed in-services
on safe food handling, sanitation, and resident nutrition consistent with Title 22 expectations Communication logs and grievance records did not reflect a pattern of complaints about food quality. The facility’s policies on food service and sanitation were current and consistent with Health & Safety standards for safe meal preparation and service.
Two staff members were interviewed. The food service supervisor stated that menus are developed to meet nutritional guidelines, with daily alternatives available, and that resident feedback is solicited and incorporated through suggestion sheets and resident council input. The caregiver interviewed reported that staff assist residents during meals, monitor intake, and promptly address concerns and provide substitutions, adjusting portions, or offering alternate textures for residents with chewing/swallowing needs. Both staff denied systemic issues with food quality and described routine temperature checks and cleanliness practices.
Two residents were interviewed; both reported the food as generally satisfactory, noting that meals are varied and substitutions are available upon request. One resident shared that they prefer milder seasoning and that staff consistently accommodate this preference; the other resident stated portion sizes are adequate and that they have not experienced problems with the freshness or temperature of meals. Two outside sources, were interviewed. Outside source 1 (OS1) reported no ongoing concerns with food quality and observed that the facility communicates about diet changes and accommodates preferences. Outside source 2 (OS2) stated the meals observed were consistent with a balanced diet and reported that residents appeared to tolerate and accept the food well, with staff responsive to dietary needs and hydration prompts.
Based on interviews, direct LPA observations and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Susan O'Shaughnessy Administrator, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.
|