1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Incident reports from the facility were reviewed. These reports confirmed that the facility has consistently documented any incidents related to C1, including those concerning the G-Tube. The reports indicated that all incidents were appropriately managed and reported.
LPA interviewed outside agency (OA) who stated that C1 is a non-verbal client that completely stopped eating solid food without any medical explanation. OA stated that a g-tube was placed on C1 due to C1's daily refusal to eat any solid food and C1's eventual weight loss. OA stated that in the recent month C1 has begun to eat solid food again and has slowly gained weight back. OA stated that although C1 has started to eat solid food they are not 100% sure that C1 will continue to eat solid food on a daily basis which is why C1 still has a g-tube. OA stated that C1 is being closely monitored by not only facility staff but also C1's personal physician, nutritionist and behavioral consultant, who are working in conjunction to make sure that when C1's g-tube is removed it is done at the correct time. OA stated they had full confidence in the facility's care. OA reported that they have witnessed firsthand C1's care at the facility and noted adherence to proper procedures.
Interview with Licensee revealed; C1 is being gradually "weaned off" the G-Tube and oral intake of food has been reintroduced as well as oral intake of medication. The licensee anticipates that the G-Tube will be removed in the near future as part of C1's care plan.
The G-Tube area was found to be well maintained and appropriately managed. There is substantial support from an outside agency affirming the quality of care provided by the facility and the various factors surrounding C1's g-tube. The licensee is actively working on transitioning C1 away from the G-Tube and has a clear plan in place for its removal. The facility maintains comprehensive incident reports that reflect consistent and accurate documentation of the client’s condition and any related issues.
Based upon the foregoing, the above listed allegation is unsubstantiated. This finding means that the preponderance of the evidence standard has not been met and the allegation is not valid.
An exit interview was conducted with Rich Enriquez. A copy of this report along with licensee rights (LIC 9058, 3/22) was provided to Rich Enriquez whose signature below verifies receipt of these rights.
|