1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continue from LIC9099)
On October 13, 2022, during a visit at the facility, two (2) caregivers were observed present at the facility. During interviews, residents indicated that staff were always present at the facility when they called out for assistance. Residents consistently stated they did not recall any time when they did not observe caregivers at the facility. In addition, outside sources indicated that during their visits they consistently observed at least two (2) caregivers present at the facility. On October 13, 2022, a collateral visit was also conducted at the adjacent facility and direct observations confirmed that three (3) staff were working at the facility. A detailed review of the personnel report and staffing schedules for the period from September 1, 2022 to October 13, 2022, for both facilities indicated that at least one (1) – two (2) staff members were scheduled to work at each of the facilities. Interviews with staff consistently stated that it was standard practice to have an extra staff member scheduled as a “floater” to work at both facilities. The floater staff was used at both facilities to provide coverage during staff breaks and lunch periods. The floater system ensured that at least one staff member was always present at each of the facilities to supervise the residents. The review of the staff schedule confirmed the floater system was employed during the time period in question.
Due to a lack of evidence, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. A finding that is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence that the alleged violations occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver, Yap and Administrator, Engdaw, a copy of this report, and Licensee Appeal Rights (9058 01/16) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. |