1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Or about January 8th, 2022, Witness 1 (W1) noted that there was an injury to R1’s left index finger. R1 reported to W1 that they ran their wheelchair into a wall crushing their finger. W1 asked Staff Member 1 (S1) to check R1’s hand. S1, who is a Licensed Vocational Nurse, recalled noticing some light bruising on R1’s hand about 5:00 PM. S1 moved the hand lightly and R1 did not report any pain. S1 did not document their assessment or elevate any concerns regarding R1. S1 reported that R1 slept through to 11:00PM, the end of S1’s shift, without complaint of pain, even when receiving care.
On or about January 9th, 2022, W1 noticed an injury to R1’s right hand.
On January 10th Staff Member 2 (S2) was getting R1 up for breakfast and noticed the bruising on R1’s hands and R1 was complaining of pain. Witness 2 (W2) came to the room already aware that R1 had injured hands. W2 transported R1 to the hospital about 10:30 AM. At about 5:30 PM R1 returned to the facility with a soft cast and a diagnosis of a metacarpal fracture to the right ring finger.
The physician that treated R1’s hand injuries did not report any suspicion of physical abuse.
During the course of the investigation, it was revealed that R1 reported multiple and incompatible explanations for their injured hands.
The investigation included interviews with staff members who provide care for R1 and all report training and practices that would protect R1 from injuries, specifically to R1’s hands.
It is unclear how R1 sustained the injuries.
It was further alleged that the call button was not assessable to R1.
Based on observation and interviews, there are always three call buttons in R1’s room. One in the bathroom, one in the living room and a portable call button in a box, generally kept on a table. R1 became agitated when the box with the call button was moved to a location, thought to be more accessible to R1. The call button was returned to the table per R1’s preference.
There is insufficient evidence to conclude that R1 did not have access to a call button.
Based on inconsistent statements, and the lack of evidence or witnesses to corroborate or support the allegations, the findings are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, and appeal rights were given to Administrator, David Armour. |