1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | [CONTINUED FROM LIC 9099, 1 of 2] Interviews of eleven (11) of eleven (11) facility staff affirmed R1 was unimpaired in both speech and cognition and able to ask for what they wanted. R1’s LIC602 Physician’s Report corroborated that R1 had no confusion/disorientation and was “able to follow instructions” and “able to communicate needs.” Moreover, the facility’s Point Click Care (PCC) Electronic Medication Administration Record (“EMAR”) software revealed R1 received NORCO at 5:32 PM on 12-13-2018, and then on 12-14-2018 at 7:37 AM, 4:16 PM, and 10:02 PM, and on 12-15-2018 at 1:42 AM, 8:37 AM, and 10:32 PM. However, noticeably absent was a record of NORCO being given during the NOC shift on 12-13-2018.
With regard to the allegation that licensee did not meet reporting requirements, it was revealed that licensee timely phoned RP about the 12-09-2018 incident, on the day it occurred. However, RP made repeated verbal and written requests to licensee for a copy of the written report, but did not receive it within seven days of the incident. LPA obtained a 12-14-2018 timestamped E-mail in which RP made an explicit request to licensee for the written report, stated that prior verbal and written requests were made, and that they felt “ignored” and “stonewalled.” LPA also obtained: a) a 12-17-2018 E-mail, in which RP made yet another request to licensee for the written report, and b) a 12-17-2018 E-mail reply to RP, in which licensee promised to release the written report to RP on 12-18-2018. Two (2) of two (2) facility managers, who were involved in processing the request, said the report was released to RP “a couple of weeks” after 12-09-2018. All parties interviewed corroborated that the written report was eventually given to RP, but none could recall the precise date the release occurred. LPA was unable to obtain primary source evidence proving the actual date of the release. Nonetheless, the evidence revealed that even in a best-case scenario, licensee did not give the written report to RP prior to 12-18-2021.
Based on records reviewed and interviews, a preponderance of evidence exists, and the above allegations are substantiated. Deficiencies are cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22; refer to the attached LIC 9099-D. Plans of Correction were jointly developed with Castile. An exit interview was conducted with the administrator, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC 811 Confidential Names list, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided via E-mail. |