1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued from LIC9099 p.1)
Interviews revealed that Staff 2 (S2) documented that they conducted the required toileting check for R1 at 9:00pm on the day in question, however R1 was found in their bathroom at approximately 11:00pm due to an unwitnessed fall from trying to use the restroom without staff assistance.
R1 informed during interview that during the incident they had attempted to use the bathroom on their own by transferring themselves from their wheelchair to the toilet. R1 attempted to stand but fell, hitting their head on the door frame. R1 could not recall if a staff member checked on them at the 9:00pm required check.
An outside source familiar with R1's care was interviewed, revealing that additional costs were paid by R1's family to have staff check on R1 every two hours, and the protocol was included in R1's care plan. The outside source informed that a video recording of R1's room during the timeframe of concern revealed that staff did not conduct the required 2-hour status/toileting check for R1, prior to the fall.
Records review revealed that R1's care plan required daily toileting checks and/or assistance at the following times: 1:00am, 5:00am, 7:00am, 9:00am, 11:00am, 1:00pm, 3:00pm, 5:00pm, 7:00pm, and 9:00pm. Care history records for R1 showed that S2 signed off on R1's care history log, indicating that they had assisted R1 with toileting at 9:00pm on the day in question. Review of video footage revealed that no staff member entered R1's room at this time. The video footage showed that staff entered R1's room at 6:57pm, and the next staff entrance into R1's room was at 11:12pm, in response to R1's fall. Records additionally showed that five (5) days prior to the incident, a meeting occurred between R1's family and the facility regarding staff not adhering to the toileting schedule for R1. The family was given a credit on their monthly bill by the facility due to the service not being provided per the schedule, and the facility informed that an in-service training would be done with staff regarding the issue.
Attempts were made to interview S2, who indicated that they had conducted a toileting check on R1 at 9:00pm on the day in question. Interview attempts were unsuccessful due to an outside individual who identified themselves as S2's representative obstructing the interview. The interview attempt did not result in any additional information relevant to the incident in question.
Based on relevant interviews and records review, the preponderance of evidence has been met that alleged violation occurred and is therefore substantiated. Deficiencies are cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 9099-D). An immediate $500 civil penalty was assessed. Per Health and Safety Code Section 1569.49, an additional civil penalty is under review by the Program Administrator of the Community Care Licensing Division. A copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were mailed to the last known address on file for the facility.
|