1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed Staff 2 (S2) on April 28, 2025. S2 stated that they did not work on the date of the incident but they were informed the following day of what occurred. S2 stated that R1 was pushed to the ground by R2. S2 was advised that R2 was being very aggressive on the day of the incident and they pushed R1. S2 stated that in the past R2 has been aggressive with both residents and staff including S2. S2 stated that R2's responsible party was advised of their aggressive behaviors and their medications were adjusted as a result.
LPA interviewed Executive Director (ED) who stated that R1, R2 and R3 walk around the memory care unit on a daily basis, not necessarily together. On the date of the incident R1 was seen approaching R2 in a corner of the unit. R1 was seen facing and talking to R2 when R2 suddenly pushed R1 causing R1 to fall back and hit their head. ED stated that a CNA was nearby serving food but could not stop or prevent the incident. ED stated that the incident was then reported to CCL.
The Department has investigated the complaint alleging lack of supervision resulted in R1 sustaining an injury. Based on evidence obtained R1 was injured after being pushed by R2. Accordingly, the above allegation is substantiated. This finding means that the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met and the allegation is valid. The deficiency is cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 and noted on the attached LIC 9099-D.
An exit interview was conducted, a plan of correction was jointly developed, and a copy of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided to Maria Sano, Executive Director. Signature on this form confirms receipt of the documents. |