1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continue from LIC9099C)
Lastly, it was alleged that staff did not receive proper training, specifically regarding how to safely transfer or reposition R1, and that caregivers lacked the necessary training to meet residents’ needs. Interviews with staff, residents, and external sources did not reveal concerns regarding staff training. A review of training records for five (5) randomly selected employees showed no violations of Title 22 regulations; all staff had completed the required training.
Additionally, in response to concerns raised by an external source, in-service training was provided to all staff during the time period of the complaint. Topics included: elopement prevention, safe use of transfer lifts, caring for residents with dementia, hospice care coordination, medication safety, Parkinson’s awareness, importance of hydration and nutrition in the elderly, fall prevention, music therapy for dementia care, behavioral management, and care for residents who are hearing or visually impaired.
Interviews with R1’s responsible party did not reveal any concerns regarding staff training or competency. Staff consistently reported having the necessary tools and skills to provide appropriate care and supervision to meet residents’ needs. There was no corroborating evidence to support this allegation.
Based on the investigation, including record reviews and interviews with staff, residents, and external sources, there was insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations. Therefore, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with the Executive Director. A copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the meeting. |