1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | denied the representative refused to accept a copy. LPA confirmed with the outside source that the representative did receive a copy of the agreement but did not recall the date.
As to the allegation the facility did not safeguard a resident’s belongings, LPA found insufficient evidence to prove this claim. LPA obtained a copy of R1’s LIC621 Resident Personal Property and Valuables. The document contained no entries. Per staff interviews, R1 had no personal property when they moved in. An interview with staff indicated that a relative of R1 took with them a bracelet on the day R1 moved into the facility. Staff interviews and records refute that R1 had property when they were admitted to the facility. Outside sources said they did not contact law enforcement to report a theft of R1’s property.
Additionally, it was stated R1’s representative was not notified when R1 experienced a change in condition. Following two choking incidents which occurred in May 2023, an outside source claimed that the resident at times refused to attend medical appointments and would not go. The source stated that the resident also refused to be transported to the hospital following one of the choking incidents. The source stated that R1 would sign refusals of treatment but did not have the cognitive capacity. A review of R1’s records revealed appraisals and needs and services plans showing R1’s representative was notified when care plan changes were made.
The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegations and obtained insufficient evidence to corroborate them. The Preponderance of Evidence standard was not met. Therefore, the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Ms. Guerrero and a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Ms. Guerrero and her signature on said documents confirms receipt of receiving them. |