1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interviews revealed that Individual 1 (I1) (see LIC811 for confidential names) was being released from another setting and was in need of urgent housing and care. I1’s responsible party resides out-of-state. The responsible party contacted the facility to see if they could care for I1. The facility representative agreed to assist the responsible party and allow I1 to come to the facility for a period of assessment. The responsible party and the facility wanted to determine if this facility would be a good home for I1.
I1 was sent to the hospital via 911 for behavioral concerns the first night I1 was at the facility. The following day the hospital released I1 who returned to the facility. I1 was sent to the hospital again the second night for the same behavioral concerns. Again, the hospital wanted to release I1 back to the facility the following day. The responsible party and the facility staff were not in support of I1 returning to the facility if I1 was being released that day. The hospital was informed that I1 would not be returning to the facility at that time.
The facility and I1’s responsible party did not have a completed and signed admission agreement as I1 was under assessment at the time I1 was sent to the hospital. Therefore, there was no violation of an agreement, and no unlawful eviction.
This complaint allegation is determined to be unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Therefore, the complaint has been dismissed.
This report was discussed with Paul Vega Assistant Manager. A copy along with Licensee Rights (01/2016) was emailed to the administrator at the conclusion of the visit. An electronic response confirms the receipt of these documents. |