1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued from LIC9099)
Staff interview further revealed that there had been ongoing confusion and communication issues between the facility and pharmacy, resulting in instances where it was unknown if a medication had been sent out, received, or should be administered. Outside interviews corroborated the communication issues, informing that the outside agency and the facility were in communication to correct the issues. No records reviewed corroborated that staff administered medication outside of R1's prescription.
Regarding the allegation, "Lack of supervision resulted in resident elopement", it was alleged that a resident eloped from the facility due to staff not providing adequate supervision. Staff interview showed that internal investigation of the incident was conducted, revealing that multiple delayed egress doors could be deactivated at the same time. This issue resulted in a resident exiting from the opposite side of the building while staff were addressing a different resident who had pushed the delayed egress door. Resident interview corroborated that the resident was able to exit through a different door during the same time the delayed egress door was pushed on the opposite side of the building. Records review revealed that staff Outside sources interviewed stated that the facility had supervision concerns during the timeframe of the complaint allegation; however, no interviews or records corroborated that there was a lack of supervision at the time of the incident. Records review, corroborated by staff interview, revealed that staff responded immediately to the delayed egress door and located the resident who had activated it. Based on the evidence gathered, the cause of the elopement was due to the unknowingly linked door system; no evidence was found to support that the elopement was due to lack of supervision. Case Management was provided with the Licensee regarding correcting the door system issue.
Based on interviews, direct LPA observations and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violation(s) occurred, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Stefanie Ancheta, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. |