1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to the allegations received, Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the hospital for an unrelated injury when it was discovered that R1 was severely dehydrated and had a UTI. It was also alleged that the R1’s diagnosis of a UTI was due to incontinence care because the staff are not properly trained to provide said care.
Review of R1’s medical assessment records dated March 2, 2023, revealed that R1 had a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia, was confused and disorientated, had limited ability to communicate, and could feed themself with set up assistance but required staff assistance for all other activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of R1’s needs and services plan dated September 3, 2024, revealed that R1 was dependent in toileting activities or unable to recognize need to use toilet. Review of R1’s medical records from their hospital visit from January 18, 2025, to January 23, 2025, revealed that R1’s diagnoses included dehydration and UTI.
Review of R1’s progress notes revealed that on January 16, 2025, R1 had an episode of diarrhea and staff were instructed to keep the resident hydrated and to offer sports drinks. Interviews with staff revealed that during the time period of R1’s hospitalization, there was a stomach virus spreading throughout the facility to the residents with an unknown origin. The staff were instructed to document diarrhea, vomiting, and/or temperature.
Interviews with staff unanimously corroborated that R1 was receiving at least five to six cups of water a day. Review of R1’s progress notes did not reveal any other incidents of R1 having an episode of diarrhea, thus records reviewed, and interviews did not reveal the source of R1’s dehydration. Review of R1’s medical records and interviews did not reveal the direct cause of R1’s UTI. Furthermore, review of facility’s staff records did not reveal that the staff are not trained to provide incontinence care. The Department attempted to interview residents in care, including R1, however, they were unable to be used as a reliable historian in this investigation due to their baseline memory loss. Interviews with outside sources, including medical professionals, did not support the allegations.
Based on interviews and record review, the investigation did not yield a preponderance of evidence to conclude that neglect/lack of supervision resulted in severe dehydration, a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and that staff are not trained to provide incontinence care. Based on the foregoing, the allegation is unsubstantiated. This finding means that although the allegation may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director McCoy, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.
|