1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | changing the briefs. Interviews also revealed that while R2 resided in the facility, to address incontinent needs, staff would put multiple incontinence products on the resident at the same time.
The second allegation is that facility staff were not allowing residents to exercise personal choices by forcing residents to shower, even if residents chose not to. Interviews conducted revealed that, oftentimes, R2 would not want to be showered. Although the resident would regularly be given bed baths and would adamantly express his/her desire to not be showered, facility staff would not honor the resident’s desires and, at times, would insist on the resident having showers during visits conducted by hospice care staff.
It was also alleged that the licensee interfered with R2’s right to select his/her own hospice agency. It was determined during the investigation that R2 received services from a hospice agency, from which R2 graduated from the services provided by the agency. Following R2’s discharge from the first agency, facility staff took steps to enroll R2 into services with another hospice agency. Within a month, R2’s responsible party was notified that a hospice agency had been selected, and it was requested that the responsible party attend a meeting, during which R2’s responsible party signed to have R2 admitted into the hospice agency that had been selected by facility staff. It was determined during the investigation that R2’s responsible party had no input or participation in selecting the second hospice agency into which R2 was admitted.
Based upon interviews conducted and records reviewed, the above allegations are substantiated. This finding means that the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met and the allegations are valid. Deficiencies are cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 and noted on the attached LIC 9099-D.
An exit interview was conducted with Jushua Mendoza, Staff, and a copy of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided to the staff at the conclusion of the visit. Jushua Mendoza's signature on this form acknowledges receipt of copies of the rights and report. |