1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to allegations R1’s responsible party was not issued a refund after only residing at the facility for five days. According to records collected, R1 moved into facility on February 14, 2024, and moved out on February 19, 2024. Interview with administrator revealed that a refund of $2,400 was issued. Interview with outside source revealed that resident’s responsible party verbally confirmed that the refund received was to be used for another facility. Interview with outside source confirmed that refund was forwarded to the facility R1 was moved into on February 21, 2024. Interview with responsible party established that responsible party agreed to have the funds forwarded to another facility.
It was also alleged that on February 16, 2024, R1 had bleeding from the rectum and facility staff did not clean R1 accordingly. Interview with staff revealed that the incident did occur, but R1 has a condition that causes rectal bleeding often. Interview with outside source revealed that R1 was observed to be clean and kempt on the date of the incident. Interview with other residents revealed that staff provided timely hygiene assistance. Records collected revealed R1 has diverticulitis of the colon.
It was also alleged that on February 17, 2024, R1 was not issued pain medication as prescribed. According to interview with outside source, staff were appropriately trained to provide R1 with sublingual medication for pain. Outside source also revealed that staff were continuously in contact with medical provider when requesting for guidance on medication administration. Interview with outside agency revealed that due to R1’s condition, some of R1’s medication would be spit up, but sublingual medication would provide effect even if spit out.
Additionally, it was alleged that staff did not seek medical assistance after having multiple bed bug bites and rectal bleeding on February 19, 2024. Interviews revealed that an outside agency was providing daily medical visits to R1. Interviews also revealed that bites could not be confirmed to be bed bugs and facility had not been exposed to bed bugs. Photographs collected could not confirm bites were a result of facility care. Records collected also confirmed that the outside source agency was providing medical care.
Lastly, it was alleged that facility did not treat for pest, resulting in R1 sustaining bug bites. According to staff, facility receives monthly pest treatment by a third-party contractor. During visit, LPA Strong did not observe any live pest in the facility. Based on records reviews, the facility has a continuous pest contract for monthly services.
|