1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | [CONTINUED FROM LIC 9099] ...and the combined afternoon/evening “PM shift” usually consisted of one (1) medication technician plus two (2) to three (3) more caregivers. The combined overnight/graveyard NOC shift usually consisted of two (2) caregivers, one of whom was also cross trained to pass medications. Interviews of direct care staff, managers, and residents generally aligned to show: When call-outs (i.e. staff not showing up for their scheduled shift) occurred on AM and PM shifts, the open/vacant shifts were usually successfully backfilled by peer staff. The facility also had two (2) managers who worked a few days each week at the facility, and they were known to personally take on medication and caregiving tasks, as needed, to backfill open shifts.
However, multiple residents and multiple direct care staff told CCLD that there were multiple occasions when one of the two scheduled NOC shift direct care staff did not show up for their assigned shift, and their open/vacant shift was not backfilled by a teammate. This left just one (1) direct care staff on duty for both Acorn Oaks Manor I and Acorn Oaks Manor II. The residents and staff interviewed on this topic agreed that having just one caregiver on duty for both facilities on NOC shift was not sufficient to meet residents’ care needs. This also meant that the fourteen (14) residents in care at Acorn Oaks Manor II were temporarily left unsupervised while the lone staff went to Acorn Oaks Manor I to care for the five (5) residents living there. Multiple staff interviews, corroborated by a manager’s interview, showed: Even when NOC shift was staffed-to-target, there were some occasions when a NOC shift caregiver observed their shift-mate/teammate briefly asleep on the job, and needing to be woken up to resume their duties. Licensee expected its NOC staff to be awake and actively working for the duration of their shift. Whenever sleeping-on-the-job instances were reported to them, facility management met with the offending employee to address their behavior and/or terminate their employment.
Based on resident and staff interviews, a preponderance of evidence exists showing that at times, Licensee did not employ staff in numbers sufficient to meet resident needs, and at times, Licensee allowed for an absence of staff supervision at the facility. Two (2) deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 809-D page). For the latter violation, an Immediate Civil Penalty of $500.00 was assessed/charged (refer to the LIC421-IM page). Since the facility has closed and ceased operations, no Plans of Correction were formed with the Licensee.
A copy of this report, the LIC 9099-D page, the LIC421-IM, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were mailed to the Licensee’s last known address via USPS certified mail. |