1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to records collected from facility, during April 2020, there were five residents receiving hospice services. Out of those five residents, only Resident 1 (R1) was receiving wound care from an outsourced hospice agency. According to R1’s Physician’s Report signed November 26th, 2019, R1 was diagnosed with a Major Neurocognitive Disorder, bladder impairment, required continuous bed care, and had a history of skin condition or breakdown. According to hospice agency R1 notes, R1’s skin remained intact within limits of disease process from date of admission to hospice on July 25th, 2019 until April 29th, 2020. Interview with hospice agency nurse providing care to R1 during this time frame, revealed that nurse did not observe R1 being left in soiled bed or resident developing further wounds. There were no additional facility records found, during the time period in question, which revealed additional hospice residents having active pressure injuries.
Additionally, during investigation, LPA Strong interviewed multiple staff and outside sources. During interviews a responsible party for a hospice resident from April 2020, stated that Resident 2 (R2) was left in soiled incontinence pad for long periods of time. According to R2’s Physician Report dated November 12th, 2019, R2 was diagnosed with a Major Neurocognitive Disorder, had bladder and bowel impairment and could communicate needs at times. During interview, responsible party could not provide a definite time frame for how long R2 had been left in soiled pad. Additional interviews with other outside sources revealed that there were no issues observed regarding facility staff leaving hospice residents in soiled bedding. Staff interviews revealed that current staff could not identify hospice residents from April 2020, being left in soiled bedding. Records reviewed revealed that facility does not have a system in place to document resident incontinence pad changes or changes in soiled bedding.
Based on LPA's interviews with staff, outside source interviews, and record reviews there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegations are determined to be unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Jennie Ayersman, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided.
|