1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a complaint investigation visit. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility by Staff, Zenia Valdehueza. LPA met with Administrator, Faria Huq.
During the investigation, interviews were conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged the licensee did not refund the preadmission fee for Resident #1 (R1). On 12/20/23, R1's responsible party had a verbal agreement with the administrator and agreed to move R1 into the facility. On 12/21/23, R1's responsible party issued a check in the amount of $500 for a preadmission fee to hold the room for R1. R1 was awaiting an assessment from the facility, to be admitted. While waiting for the assessment, R1's responsible party changed their mind and decided not to admit R1 to the facility. Title 22 Regulations requires the licensee to provide the applicant or representative with a written general statement describing all costs associated with the preadmission fee. The Administrator confirmed a Preadmission Agreement form was not signed, as there was only a verbal agreement in place. Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 8 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. |