1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | facility was taken over. Notably, staffing was reviewed and ultimately reduced. According to staff, the reason for the reduction was to increase efficiency. Thirteen (13) employees, mostly kitchen servers and housekeeping staff were laid off. Four (4) of the former employees have returned to work in a part time capacity. Staff said the number of staff versus residents in care was not justifiable since the facility is licensed for 425 but the resident census is about 200.
In regard to housekeeping and sanitation, staff interviews and facility records indicate that each resident room is cleaned weekly as they were before the layoffs. Each housekeeper works 7.5-hour shifts. And schedules indicate at least one housekeeper is on duty and assigned to serve each housing area (Gardens, East, West, South). Housekeepers clean resident rooms and common areas throughout the facility. Housekeepers also perform laundry service. Interviews with residents yielded no complaints about facility cleanliness or inadequate housekeeping service. LPA's observation during the inspection was that resident rooms were odor free, neat, and organized. LPA also noted that the common areas, hallways, and walls were without offensive orders, markings, or stains.
LPA conducted a review of facility food service for this complaint investigation. Interviews and facility records noted that each server provides service for up to five tables. Staff reported that this was changed in conjunction with the aforementioned layoffs. Previously, housekeepers only served three tables at a time. Prior to the layoffs, servers would refill resident’s coffee cups. Now, wait staff places coffee carafes on resident tables so residents can refill their cups themselves. Undeniably, staff said this may have caused some minor delays.
During the facility inspection, LPA visited the various dining rooms. LPA observed staff taking resident orders to the kitchen, serving meal orders and cleaning tables. Based on interviews, residents generally did not report dissatisfaction with food service. None of the residents interviewed stated their food service was delayed. When asked, residents stated they were satisfied with food freshness, quality, presentation, and portion size. One resident said the lunch meal, at times, is cold but also said the breakfast and dinner meals are generally served warm and are good.
When asked, staff said management sent written notification to residents and their families advising them of the changes. Staff said they also held resident council meetings. Staff received some initial concerns because prior to the changes, residents generally received a more comfortable level of service. Staff said |