1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | [CONTINUED FROM LIC 9099]
The training consisted of an instructional video on a large-screen projector, use of an actual evacuation chair as a visual aid, and answering questions. CDSS reviewed the sign-in sheet and meeting agenda for this day, which shows 21 front line staff attended. S2 trained them on “the evacuation chair,” as well as on prioritization during a fire and the correct use of a fire extinguisher. CDSS reviewed the above-mentioned training video, which was 3 minutes and 56 seconds long and produced by Evacuscape, the manufacturer of the facility’s evacuation chairs. CDSS also encountered photographic proof of the training, which showed S2 as a presenter and a frame of said training video in the background.
CDSS also interviewed 15 frontline staff comprising drivers, caregivers, med techs, housekeepers, and concierge receptionists: 5 of 15 said they attended the training with S2 on July 29th, 2021, and corroborated that it occurred as described by S1 and S2. Another 3 of 15 staff said they missed the July 29th, 2021 training, but attended a prior year’s training on the evacuation chair, also led by S2. Another 2 of 15 staff said they were unable to attend S2’s training due to being nocturnal staff – however, the facility’s Director of Health Services (S3) recently conducted a separate training class on the evacuation chair for the night shift, which they rated as effective. Another 1 of 15 frontline staff said they completed a computer training module on the evacuation chair. A few of the staff also said they possessed evacuation chair training from a former employer by time of hire. The evidence shows that by the time of the complaint and CDSS’ ensuing investigation, a majority of licensee’s frontline staff received training on the evacuation chair, and that licensee facilitated evacuation chair training for its staff more than once. According to records, licensee also performed quarterly disaster drills, engaging direct care staff from all three of its work shifts.
Based on LPA’s observations, staff interviews, and review of facility records, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to support the allegation that licensee did not meet training requirements related to emergency preparedness. The allegation is therefore unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Cadmus, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided via E-mail. |