1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During an interview with R1, they reported multiple incidents involving improper medication administration at the facility. R1 recalled an incident occurred on or around August 1, 2024, when staff 4 (S4) dispensed medications without doing so in R1’s presence. R1 expressed concern stating they were unsure of the source of the medication in the pill container and requested that S4 repour it in their presence. Additionally, R1 reported missing two medications on August 12, 2024, due to incorrect pharmacy information on the MAR.
Five (5) staff members knowledgeable about medication administration were interviewed as part of the investigation. During the interviews, three (3) staff members stated that R1 did not miss any medications. One (1) staff member acknowledged not pouring R1’s medication R1’s presence. Another staff member confirmed that the Admission Agreement forms that were presented and signed during the admission process contained an incorrect pharmacy name.
During an interview, Outside Source 1 (OS1) reported that on July 9, 2024, R1’s physician clarified a medication order; however, facility staff did not update the medication order on record until July 19, 2024. OS1 stated that R1 missed two medications on August 12, 2024, because the facility provided OS1 with the incorrect pharmacy name.
A review of records revealed on June 13, 2024, R1 refused a medication, stating the facility had the wrong dose. R1 indicated that the medication was supposed to be administered three times a day, rather than two times a day. The records further confirmed that the physician clarified the order on July 9, 2024, but the facility did not update the medication record until July 19, 2024.
On June 24, 2024, CCL received a complaint alleging that the facility did not assist in disseminating information regarding family council meetings and did not assign a designated a staff liaison to aid the family council.
On June 25, 2024, LPA Domingo observed postcard invitations to the family council meeting placed at the front desk of the facility.
Four (4) family members were interviewed during the investigation. These outside sources corroborated the allegations, stating they were unaware of any family council meetings, or a designated staff liaison to aid with the family council.
An interview with Staff 1 (S1) revealed that family council postcards were placed only at the front desk on June 21, 2024. An interview with Staff 2 (S2) revealed that the facility had placed one family council information board at the front of the C building, along with postcards at the front desk detailing family council information and a contact person for the meetings. S2 explained that the family council is a family-led activity, and that facility staff do not get involved. S2 also confirmed that there was no designated staff liaison appointed to the family council and that information about the family council meetings was not included in mailings to residents or their designees.
Three (3) staff members were interviewed during the investigation, corroborated the allegations that the facility did not assist in disseminating information about the family council meetings, and did not assign a designated a staff liaison to aid the family council.
A review of three (3) records of recently admitted residents showed that none of the admission agreement were updated with information about the family council meetings, which started on July 15, 2024.
Two (2) family members were interviewed during the investigation stated they were aware of the newly established family council meetings through word of mouth but had no information regarding when or where the meetings were being held.
The Department investigated the above allegations and was able to meet the preponderance of the evidence standard. Therefore, the above allegations are substantiated. Deficiencies were cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, and is noted on the attached LIC9099-D. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Sanjay Kabadi, which included jointly developing plans of correction. A copy of these reports along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22), were provided at the conclusion of the visit.
|