1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interviews conducted with residents revealed no complaints regarding the care or cleanliness of the facility, with some residents stating the facility staff have been extremely great, and attentive to their needs. Interviews conducted with outside sources also revealed no complaints. During this time, CCL records revealed being in daily contact with facility staff to confirm they were properly staffed, had adequate equipment and resources, including cleaning supplies for sanitizing the facility.
It was also alleged that R1 was left in soiled undergarments. A resident records review revealed R1 was embarrassed to request for toileting assistance and staff were to encourage R1 to use their pendant. Records also revealed during staff checks there was documentation of several refusals by R1 for toileting assistance, and notation of staff encouraging R1 to seek staff’s help for toileting.
Lastly, it was alleged that staff did not seek medical attention for R1. Facility records revealed R1 received multiple checks a day, staff documented R1’s status during each check, and if any changes in conditions were observed, or R1 had any complaints staff documented contacting R1’s Primary Care Physician (PCP) and updating R1’s care plan as needed. On December 5, 2020, a short time before the complaint was filed R1 complained of discomfort while urinating, staff sent R1 to the hospital that day and was treated for a UTI.
Due to lack of corroborating evidence, the finding regarding the above allegations were established to be unsubstantiated. This finding means although the allegations may have happened or could be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred.
An exit interview was conducted, Appeal Rights (LIC 9098 01/16) along with a copy of this report was provided to BOM Veal and signature on this form confirms receipt of these rights. |