1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued from LIC9099 3 0f 3)
Staff 2 (S2) was interviewed, and they stated that for the safety of R1, they will be requesting the family members who were in the room to only visit R1 in the common areas. At no time did S2 deny family members' visitation for R1. S2 explained to the family members that the visitation restrictions were implemented due to the family providing care to R1 without a physician's order. Records reviewed revealed there was no physician's order to digitally remove R1's bowel movements.
Outside source 4 (OS4) was interviewed, and they agreed that due to the family members' actions, they should only visit R1 in the common areas.
It was alleged that staff are not following the resident's special diet. Review of resident 1’s (R1) medical records revealed that R1 requires food cut, chopped, pureed, or otherwise prepared. R1 requires staff assistance with all activities of daily living, including eating meals, bathing, dressing, and toileting.
Record review revealed that R1’s medical condition has declined, and R1 is currently under hospice care. Interviews and record review revealed that R1 had declined in meal intake care and had poor meal intake while under hospice care.
Interviews and records review did not support any evidence that staff are not following the resident's special diet. Interviews with an outside source revealed they have not had any issues with the facility or with the meals/foods being served. Interviews with staff also revealed that some clients eat different meals depending on their preferences or dietary restrictions.
This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that staff did not ensure the resident's wound care needs were met, staff are not providing incontinence care to the resident, and staff restricted the resident's visitation rights. The Department has found that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and licensee rights (LIC 9058 03/22). Executive Director, Cathy Allen's signature on this form confirms receipt of these rights.
|