1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued form LIC9099)
Regarding the allegation, the Staff are not following the resident’s admission agreement. More specifically, on two recent occasions, the resident was reportedly not checked as required, missed a scheduled medication, and did not receive assistance with food preparation due to staffing issues and shift changes. Staff interviews confirmed that Resident #1 has an individualized care plan in place and that staff are expected to follow it. Records reviewed did not indicate any medication errors, and staff schedules were provided for Department review. LPA observations during multiple unannounced visits confirmed that residents were supervised during activities and meals. Interviews with various outside sources revealed no concerns regarding staff adherence to residents’ admission agreements. This same allegation was previously investigated in March and April 2025 and found to be unsubstantiated. The Department re-evaluated the concerns during the current investigation.
Regarding the allegation, Staff did not respond to the resident’s need for help in a timely manner. More specifically, it was reported that staff delayed in assisting a resident. Additionally, during a recent evening visit, the reporting party stated they waited over an hour while seeking help before the resident was assisted and put to bed. Staff interviews revealed that radios and cellphones are used to communicate and respond to resident needs. In the memory care unit, staff also heavily rely on consistent observation to monitor residents. Staff reported they were attending to other residents at the time and denied any delays. Former Executive Director Allen stated that response times are prioritized and monitored according to protocol. Interviews with outside sources, including evening visitors, revealed no concerns about staff responsiveness. A review of records showed no documentation of delays or complaints on the date in question. A records review of staffing, specifically the memory care unit, revealed the licensee operate the facility in accordance with the terms specified in the plan of operation. LPA observations during multiple unannounced visits confirmed that staff responded promptly to residents’ needs.
Based on interviews, direct LPA observations and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Associate Executive Director Aileen Spence, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. |