1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued from LIC9099)
The Department’s interviews with R1 revealed that they experienced delayed pendant responses on multiple occasions, including a specific incident on October 12, 2025, during which they stated that staff did not respond for over 90 minutes. R1 also reported a retaliatory comment from a staff member. R1 further revealed they had requested Staff #1 not to be assigned to help them and one time R1 witnessed Staff #1(S1) in the hallway outside their room.
The Department conducted a records review over a random 10-day period for the floor where Resident #1 (R1) resides as well as the R1's own call log. During this time, call logs showed average response times ranging from 10 to 13 minutes for the floor on which R1 resides. R1 activated their call light 81 times, with an individual average response time of 12.19 minutes. As part of the review, it was noted that on October 12, 2025, R1 requested assistance using the call light four times between 5:00 a.m. and 8:30 a.m., with an average response time of 14.25 minutes for those calls. The department also conducted Interviews with other residents on the same floor and they revealed very little concern with call response times, stating they occasionally will experience more delay in the morning, and they feel the delayed response may be due to the number of residents getting up at the same time and needing assistance.
The department interviewed staff and they confirmed S1 is not assigned to the resident but may occasionally may be stationed or work outside the room of R1. Staff also revealed that routinely, two caregivers are assigned to respond to R1 requests to ensure staff safety and accountability. The department interviewed multiple care staff, and they denied they made retaliatory comments to R1. Interviews conducted with other residents on the same floor as well as residents within the community revealed no concerns with staff behavior when they need assistance nor have they witnessed retaliatory comments from staff.
Based on interviews, direct LPA observations and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violations occurred. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Operations Director Emily Turner, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. |