1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | [Continuation of LIC9099]
OS2 also revealed attempting an interview with C1, who appeared to be in good spirits, was not qualified and corroborated C1 is non-verbal. Interviews with OS2 and OS3) both corroborated that C1’s Responsible Party (RP) disclosed C1 bruises very easily and sustains bruising all the time. The RP also disclosed a recent incident occurred while they assisted C1 in the bath and just by assisting C1 stand up by holding their arms resulted in similar bruising to C1’s arms.
An interview conducted with OS3 revealed the facility notified them regarding the incident on May 20, 2025, and OS3 conducted a visit to the facility on that same day. OS3 met with facility staff as well as the RP who happened to be present which is when OS3 was able to obtain the information from the RP mentioned above. It was also revealed the RP stated C1 is very pale which made their bruises more pronounced. The RP had no concern of any issues of abuse or mal-intent by facility staff regarding C1’s bruising. C1 and the staff get along great. The RP revealed they were very happy with the facility and C1 has resided at the facility for over six years, and had a great relationship with facility staff, which have remained consistent over time.
Interviews conducted with facility Staff1 (S1) corroborated the information disclosed by OS2 and OS3 regarding C1’s propensity to falls and how C1 easily sustains bruising. Facility staff have measures in place for fall prevention, C1 is never handled in a rough manner and staff have no control over C1 bruising. S1 also revealed C1 tends to get up in the middle of the night to use the restroom and staff are on high alert to ensure assistance with using the restroom which requires help with getting up from the toilet. S1 revealed any situation when staff must assist C1 with getting up, or other ambulation such as getting into the transport bust,, could easily result in C1 substaining bruising.
Based on interviews conducted with staff and outside sources the Department determined the allegation to be Unsubstantiated. An Unsubstantiated finding means there was insufficient evidence to meet the preponderance of evidence standard to prove the violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Krista Duvall, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee’s Rights (LIC9058 01/16) will be provided.
|