1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation staff did not meet resident’s toileting needs, it was reported that on April 4, 2023, staff left R1 sitting on the toilet 30 minutes or more. Information obtained from interview with Administrator, Mike McCoy stated he was not advised of any issues or concerns regarding R1 needing assistance. It was advised that at the time of admission, R1 was independent and did not require assistance with toileting. Information obtained from staff interviews stated that they see R1 two to three times a week and that R1 has not shared with them that they were left unattended while in the restroom. Information obtained from interview with R1 stated that they can still use the restroom without assistance and that they did not recall pressing the call pendant while on the toilet. An interview with R1’s Hospice Nurse was conducted and advised that R1 is seen two to three times a week and R1 did not inform them of any issues or concerns regarding need assistance with toileting. A review of R1’s Admission Agreement confirmed there were no notations indicating R1 required assistance with toileting needs. LPA’s review of the records verified that R1 was not incontinent at time of admission or requested assistance with toileting services during placement.
Regarding the allegation staff did not answer resident’s call button in a timely manner, it was reported that it takes an extended amount of time for facility staff to answer the call button. Information obtained from interview with the Administrator stated R1 has not brought it to management’s attention that R1 pressed their call pendant and that no caregiver responded. Information obtained from interviews with facility staff and was advised that R1 did not advise of any concerns. Staff stated call buttons are answered as quickly as possible. Information obtained from interview with R1 stated they do not recall utilizing the call button and not receiving assistance.
Regarding the allegation staff do not meet resident’s dietary needs, information obtained from interview with Administrator advised that R1 does not have any type of special diet and no food restriction that the management team is aware of. Additional information obtained from interview with facility staff advised that R1 eats solid foods and does not require a special diet. LPA observed R1 in the dining hall on eating solid foods. LPA conducted a review of R1’s Physician’s Report and there were no information regarding R1 requiring a special diet.
Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the allegations that staff do not meet resident's dietary needs, staff did not meet resident's toileting needs, and staff did not answer resident's call button in a timely manner, are unsubstantiated. A finding of unsubstantiated means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was explained and provided to Business Office Manger, Jhonalyn Libunao.
|