1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interviews conducted with Facility Staff1 (S1) and Staff2 (S2) revealed C1 does not follow house rules and clients are not allowed to do their own laundry unassisted. Staff interviews and a facility tour also revealed the laundry room remains locked due to the toxins that are kept in the laundry room, per Title 22 regulation. Outside source records also revealed C1 was not allowed to leave the facility unassisted except for attending school. Outside Source (OS1 and OS2) interviews revealed C1 does not recognize their disability and feels they should be able to do whatever they want making placement for C1 difficult. C1 also refuses to attend doctor appointments, including a psychiatrist for an evaluation.
It was also alleged facility staff speak inappropriately to clients in care. Interviews with conducted with facility staff, an outside source, and a Client2 (C2) revealed no evidence supporting the allegation. A record review also revealed C1 was threatening to file a complaint. At the time of the complaint C1 was angry after facility staff notified them if they continued to break house rules, they would have to seek alternative placement.
Based on LPA’s observations, records review, and interviews conducted with clients, staff, and outside sources the above allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated. An unsubstantiated finding means although the allegation may have occurred the preponderance of the evidence standard has not been met.
An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Jones and a copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) will be provided . Signature of this form confirms receipt the documents were received. |