1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099
Regarding the allegation “Resident sustained pressure injuries while in care”, it was alleged that a resident developed bed sores due to staff not tending to their incontinence care needs. Interviews conducted with staff revealed that the resident did not sustain any type of pressure injuries while in care at the facility but was admitted with pressure sores, which the facility attempted to resolve. Records reviewed revealed a documented pressure ulcer by a physician that preceded the resident’s admission to the facility. No documents reviewed in the resident’s file noted that incontinence care was not being provided by staff.
Regarding the allegation, “Staff did not meet resident's incontinence needs”, it was alleged that staff did not bathe a resident, resulting in medical issues in the perineal area. Staff interview revealed that the resident in question was to receive 6 showers per week, but the resident would decline to take showers multiple times per week, which is a personal right. Records review revealed that family members of the resident in question prevented certain staff members from providing showers to the resident as well as grooming care. Records review confirmed that the facility agreed to provide 6 showers per week to the resident and staff members were aware of this expectation. No records reviewed revealed that incontinence care and bathing assistance were not being provided or attempted by staff.
Regarding the allegation, “Unlawful Eviction”, it was alleged that the facility attempted to evict a resident without proper notice. Staff interviews revealed that the resident in question was moved by the Responsible Party due to needing a higher level of care that the facility was not able to provide. Records reviewed revealed that the Responsible Party was actively looking for another facility for the resident to be placed, and the facility continued to care for the resident until a new placement was found. No records reviewed indicated that the resident was evicted unlawfully.
Regarding the allegation, “Staff did not assist resident with medication as prescribed”, it was alleged that staff administered a medication to a resident after it was discontinued by the resident’s doctor. No staff interviewed had knowledge of the resident in question being given discontinued medication. Electronic Medication Administration records were inaccessible to be reviewed due to the facility undergoing new ownership and no longer having access to the electronic record. No records reviewed in the physical file indicated that the resident in question was being given a discontinued medication.
Continued on LIC9099-C |