1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | While at the hospital, an x-ray revealed a dislocation of the same thumb. R1 had orthopedic surgery, and their hand was placed in a cast, with prescribed antibiotics for the infection.
On or about February 26, 2020, because of their infected thumb, R1 developed a highly infectious bacterial condition identified as Clostridium Dificile (“C-Diff”). The treating physician subsequently evaluated R1 as asymptomatic and did not recommend re-testing since there was no active C-Diff. Medical records noted R1’s symptoms had improved with oral medications, and R1 was evaluated as stable and ready for discharge from a skilled nursing facility on March 3, 2020. However, staff refused to allow R1 to return, in violation of their own Infection Control policy regarding C-Diff. Review of facility policy records noted that any resident with C-Diff should reside in a private room and not share a bathroom with other residents. The policy stated that preventive measures would be taken to prevent C-Diff infections among residents, including using standard precautions while caring for a resident with C-Diff at the facility. Records showed that during R1’s stay in the skilled nursing facility, R1 was placed with roommates and allowed to dine in common areas, since they were evaluated as no longer contagious. On March 13, R1 was admitted to another licensed care facility.
It was also alleged that the facility did not provide a copy of R1's signed admission agreement to their authorized representative and did not provide a refund. There were conflicting interview statements by outside sources; however, review of records obtained during the investigation showed a copy of the admission agreement was given at the time of R1's admission, and a partial refund of prepaid fees was issued to their responsible party, as required. Although a partial refund was issued, the amount the facility refunded was incorrectly calculated. Based on records, the resident was initially turned away by the facility when R1 was discharged by the hospital on March 3, 2020. As such, the refund should have been pro-rated as of said date. The facility refunded R1’s responsible party a partial refund of about one week's worth for the month of March 2020. The facility did not refund the full amount that was owed to the family. Based on the information obtained there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation.
There was sufficient evidence to support the allegations that the facility did not allow R1 to return without providing a required eviction notice, resulting in an unlawful eviction and the facility did not allot the family their full refund based on the admission agreement. The Department has investigated this allegations and has determined it to be Substantiated, meaning the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. The deficiencies were cited on the attached LIC9099-D form. An exit interview was conducted, a plan of correction was jointly developed, and a copy of this report along with licensee rights was provided to facility representative Rachel McIntyre, Health and Wellness Director whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.
“This is an amended version of the original report created on 11/02/2023." |