1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | discharged from the hospital and returned to the facility. On 3/17/21, the facility noticed that R1 was not at baseline, unable to ambulate on own, and was using the wheelchair to ambulate. On 3/22/21, R1 was found to be favoring one side of the body. A visiting doctor was at the facility and was notified regarding resident’s condition. Physician found a coccyx pressure injury wound and ordered home health (HH) for R1. Facility sent R1 to the hospital the same day, 3/22/21 for a condition unrelated to the pressure injury. An interview with outside/sources confirmed that R1 had left side weakness and was taken to the hospital due to stroke-like symptoms. R1 stayed at the hospital that night. R1 was discharged and returned to the facility on 3/23/21.
Upon the resident’s return, Home Health Nurse (HHN) was ordered specifically for the pressure injury on 3/24/21 by facility staff. Resident was already on HH for unrelated services. Interviews with staff were inconsistent with the records reviewed and maintained that R1 obtained the pressure injury while at the hospital during their stay on 3/22/21 – 3/23/21. Staff indicated that the pressure injury was observed on 3/24/21. Facility staff observed the pressure injury and notified physician and outside agency. R1’s responsible party was notified and informed of the pressure injury on 3/25/21. According to interview statements the in house physician stated that on 3/24/21, R1 had a stage II pressure injury and was sent to the hospital. HH was immediately ordered for treatment. On 3/25/21 HHN determined the pressure injury was now a Stage III. On 3/26/21, R1 was sent to the hospital for treatment of the pressure injury. R1 was discharged to a skilled nursing facility on 3/29/21 where the pressure injury worsened to a Stage IV (unstageable). Dates were inconsistent; however, records reviewed during the investigation showed that the hospital had no notes or documentation regarding concerns for neglect. Based on the interviews and records reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to prove that sustained unstageable pressure injury was due to neglect.
It was also alleged that staff did not notify the authorized representative about the change of resident’s health condition for the pressure injury sustained. Facility records indicated that the facility had ongoing communication with the authorized representatives regarding the condition of the resident. Per notes in facility records the authorized representative for R1 was notified on 3/22/21 when R1 was sent to the hospital and again on 3/25/21 regarding |