1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | on 03/26/21, the resident was sent out to the hospital for the third time due to an observed pressure injury. R1 was not discharged back to the facility but was sent to a skilled nursing facility due to a higher level of care needs. Evidence obtained during the investigation did not support the allegation that staff did not discharge resident to a medical facility in a timely manner.
It was also alleged that staff did not provide necessary assistance for resident R1. Documentation obtained showed the resident was assisted by staff and Physical Therapist on a continual basis. Review of documentation including plan of care (needs and services plan) showed R1 received staff assistance with basic services, including dressing, grooming, prompting for meals and with transfers. Progress notes indicated staff assisted resident with prescribed medication, meals, doctor visits, baseline observations and following physician and Hospice/Home Health orders. Interviews with outside sources did not support the allegation that staff did not provide necessary assistance with basic services. The outside sources recalled observing facility staff assisting resident R1 with meals and transferring. Staff interviews were inconclusive and could not provide relevant information on specific orders or routines involving R1; however, outside sources recalled assisting resident R1 with care when needed. Other outside sources recalled staff ensuring their rounds were completed and in general, residents were routinely checked every two hours. Based on documentation and interviews with outside sources, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that staff did not provide resident R1 with necessary assistance.
It was further alleged that the facility was falsely advertising that a former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) was a medical doctor on a Facebook page of Vista Gardens. Documentation from the Medical Board of California dated July 20, 2021 confirmed it had ordered this former CEO to cease and desist from the use of “doctor” or “Dr.” to consumers. However, a review of the former Facebook page dated 11/04/21 did not reveal the name of the former CEO as a “doctor”. A 4/11/22 search of the Facebook website determined the CEO was only mentioned on the site on the following previous dates: 2/17/18, October 24, 2017, and September 22, 2017 in third-party postings, and this individual was referred to as a “Dr.” No other individuals, including the former CEO, are mentioned on the website as being skilled medical professionals after the 6/24/21 date of the Medical Board order. Based on the records reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that the facility was making false claims on a public advertisement. |