1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | [Continued from LIC 9099]
R1 is a non-ambulatory resident at the facility who utilizes a motorized wheelchair. Per R1's physician's report, they are able to leave the facility unassisted and have no diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or Dementia.
On 10/7/25 the facility issued a 30-day notice to R1, and a copy was shared to the Department. Per review of the notice, it was discovered that the a phone number on the notice for appeals information was incorrect. LPA informed the facility of the technicality and that the notice was now invalid. On 11/10/25, the facility issued a new and corrected 30-day notice to R1, the reasons remaining the same: 1. Failure to comply with the house rules and policies of the facility 2. Engaging in behavior which is a threat to the mental and/or physical safety of others in the facility 3. Noncompliant with recommended medical treatment 4. Methamphetamine abuse per discharge papers for a hospital stay in September 2025 5. Suspected camera in R1's room 6. Resident cannot operate well in their electric wheelchair.
Per the notice, sections 11 (house rules/policies) and 20 (conditions for eviction) of R1's admissions agreement contract were specified. Review of R1's admissions agreement revealed that under section 20 (conditions for eviction), subsection (D)(1): " The reasons relied upon for the eviction, with specific facts to permit determination of the date, place, witnesses, and circumstances concerning those reasons." Additionally, under section 11 (house rules/policies) it is noted that "failure to comply may result in a written warning. After sufficient warning, a notice of eviction will be given to the resident and/or responsible person."
The notice itself did not supply specific incidents or information regarding the reasons for eviction. Per interview with administrative staff, it was revealed that no written documentation of incidents or previous meetings with R1 regarding their alleged misbehavior/facility concerns were held. It was revealed that verbal warnings were issued, but no documentation of such was able to be provided. An outside source interviewed revealed that they had received no supporting documentation from the facility for the reasoning for eviction. Another outside source interviewed revealed concerns that there was no substantial basis for the eviction in the first place, labeling it "suspicious."
[Continued on LIC 9099-C] |