1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Cont. from LIC-9099-C)
Regarding the allegation that staff did not follow protocols to prevent the spread of scabies and that staff are not following reporting requirements, interviews reported that R1 was isolated each time scabies was suspected or diagnosed, and that staff followed infection control procedures including PPE use, and additional cleaning. Staff stated that no other residents developed scabies, and that another resident(R2) who was evaluated for a rash tested negative for scabies. Interviews reported that the administrator notified the public health department regardless of only one case of scabies, and that the department stated that this was not an outbreak case.
Records review of the facility’s infection control policy included clear scabies prevention protocols such as isolation, laundry procedures, PPE use, and environmental cleaning. Review of email correspondence showed that the facility reported scabies concerns to the Department of Public Health. Records review revealed that the facility sent incident reports for R1 and R2 sent to CCLD regarding rash/scabies and follow up for the conditions of both residents. Medical records confirmed that R1 received prescribed treatments, and documentation showed that the second resident tested negative for scabies following a skin scrape.
Regarding the allegation that staff did not implement prescribed medical treatment in a timely manner, interviews reported following physician orders as they were received and administering treatments accordingly. Staff stated that one prescription was delayed over a weekend because the pharmacy did not process it, and the facility was not notified until the following Monday. Staff reported following up immediately upon returning, and the pharmacy acknowledged and apologized for the delay. The reporting party confirmed that the delay was caused by the pharmacy rather than the facility. Staff also reported that oral medications, creams, and antibiotic treatments were administered according to medical instructions, and that home health supported wound care and daily bathing when needed.
Records review of R1's medication prescriptions and medication administration record revealed that the delayed prescription was later processed and administered, and all other ordered treatments were provided as directed.
The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegations and based upon the information obtained during this investigation, it is determined that the preponderance of evidence was not met to support or corroborate these allegations and therefore deemed unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Susan Caccam, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee’s Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided.
|