1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | [CONTINUED FROM LIC 9099]
All interviews showed R1 was their own responsible party and their stay at the facility was subsidized by a third-party payee, a Medi-Cal based health group (HG). (The facility itself was not a direct recipient of Medi-Cal or Supplemental Security Income funds.) Based on a recent reassessment, R1’s physician determined that R1 could now self-manage their medications. R1 no longer met criteria for continued HG funding, and it expired. Around this time, R1 had multiple conversations with S1 in person and through written correspondence. According to Staff #2 (S2), they were witness to at least one of these in-person meetings. Per S1’s interview: they did not ask R1 to relocate from the facility. Rather, they invited R1 to continue living at the facility under their existing residency agreement contract and pay privately. However, R1 did not want to be indebted to the facility and elected to leave, choosing their own move out date, and arranging the logistics of their departure. In their interview, S2 corroborated that S1 did not ask R1 to move out; R1 voluntarily left.
CCLD reviewed the facility’s time and date stamped electronic progress notes, which said R1 was “independent with all ADLs” and “able to make [their] own decisions,” described the move out arrangements R1 made for themselves, and reiterated that “[R1] voluntarily discharged” because “insurance stopped coverage for assisted living and [R1 was] unable or unwilling to pay private pay for room and board.” CCLD also reviewed written correspondence between R1 and facility staff, which confirmed they were not being evicted and the move-out was their choice.
There was no evidence in staff interviews, facility progress notes, or written correspondence to corroborate that R1 requested care documents beyond their facility medication list. S1 and S2 said on move out day, R1 left the facility with both their medication list and active medications, which the facility’s progress notes and R1 themselves confirmed. Regarding R1’s desire to contact their HG social worker, S1 told CCLD they provided R1 with the HG’s main phone number, as per the HG’s protocol. In their interview, R1 confirmed knowing their HG member identification number, calling the HG at the number S1 provided, and speaking directly with their HG physician multiple times. In a subsequent interview: R1 told CCLD they appealed the HG’s decision to end their assisted living subsidy and won. R1 found new housing and did not seek to return to Cloisters of the Valley, LLC.
[CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C, 2 of 2] |