1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation did not yield any order(s) issued by R2’s physician for medications to be crushed. The investigation also did not yield any evidence to corroborate that facility staff dissolved R2’s medication in water prior to administering.
The second allegation is that the facility did not have staff in sufficient numbers to meet residents’ needs. It was reported that R1 required assistance with showering; however, R1 was allowed to shower alone. The investigation did not yield any evidence to corroborate that R1 had been left alone or unsupervised by staff while showering.
The third allegation is that staff did not meet the needs of the residents. It was reported that R1 required hearing aids and, on multiple occasions, staff did not insert the hearing aids correctly. Additionally, it was reported that R1 developed a urinary tract infection as a result of not being showered by facility staff. The investigation revealed that R1 was hearing impaired and relied upon staff to assist with cleaning the hearing aids, ensuring the batteries were properly installed, and ensuring the hearing aids were in R1’s ears. The investigation also revealed that R1 was cognitively alert and able to advise when the hearing aids were not aiding the resident in hearing. The investigation produced evidence that staff who worked with R1 received training on how to properly care for and assist residents with the use of hearing aids. The investigation did not yield evidence to conclude that staff did not properly insert the hearing aids or assist R1 with the hearing aids as needed. Relative to the urinary tract infection, during the investigation, staff communication logs were reviewed, and the logs reflected that R1 received showers in accordance with R1’s established care plan. The investigation did not yield evidence to conclude that R1 was not routinely showered or that a lack of showers caused R1 to have a urinary tract infection.
The fourth allegation is that resident’s property was not safeguarded. It was reported that R2 wore dentures, and R2’s dentures broke because they were not properly stored by staff at night. Evidence yielded that R2 did wear dentures that night staff assisted the resident with storing at night and day staff assisted the resident with properly inserting in the mornings. The investigation produced evidence that R2’s dentures were broken at a time while residing in the home. The investigation did not produce evidence to conclude that the dentures were broken because they were not properly stored or due to any action or inaction on the part of facility staff. |