1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The Department interviewed facility management. According to facility management, R1 provided inconsistent statements, changing the gender of the caregiver, and inconsistencies on when the abuse took place. R1 sometimes stated it occurred during medication application, while being assisted with changing, or that it had occurred in the shower during a bath. R1 was not able to provide a specific date or time as to when the abuse occurred. The facility was only aware of the Sheriff’s investigation, as an officer came out to the facility after R1 was Hospitalized for an unrelated medical issue on 5/8/2022. Facility management was not aware of any other similar report from R1. Facility management believed R1 may have reported abuse to facilitate R1’s transfer out of the facility.
An incident report obtained from the San Diego County Sheriff’s Office reported the following
information. On 5/9/2022, a Sheriff’s officer interviewed R1, who reported the alleged incident had occurred approximately six months prior. R1 did not recall the exact date or time, only that the incident had occurred in the morning and that S1 had raped R1. During the interview, R1 had difficulty staying focused, would veer off topic, and would become agitated with unrelated topics. There were no witnesses, no evidence collected, and due to the time elapsed since the incident, no Sexual Assault Response Team (SART) exam was conducted. R1 also told the responding officer the incident had already been reported to the Sheriff's Department, but that officer was unable to complete the report. The responding officer’s search for the report did not produce any previous reports from R1. The officer attempted contacts with the reporting party, and with S1, but all were unsuccessful.
An interview with S1, conducted by the Department, revealed S1 assisted R1 with showers, medication management, and partial toileting needs. S1 was aware R1 had made allegations of being touched inappropriately by S1, but S1 denied any sexual interaction from S1, nor from other staff at the facility.
Interviews with residents, and current and former staff did not reveal any concerns regarding abuse at the facility. These sources did not witness any type of abuse at the facility.
Based on the evidence obtained, there was not enough evidence to prove the alleged violation
occurred, therefore, the allegation was Unsubstantiated.An exit interview was conducted with Doctolero, to whom a copy of this report, LIC 811 Confidential names list, and Licensee/Appeals Rights (LIC 9058) were provided. |