1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | S1 was advised that C1 would need to be picked up from their day program. S1 advised APD that they were currently not available to pick up C1, however they would pick C1 up at 4:30 pm. APD agreed that it would be ok to pick up C1 at 4:30 pm.
APD advised C1 that staff from their primary residence would be picking them up soon. C1 left the premises and walked to the parking lot area next to the facility. Per APD, C1 was within in eyesight the entire time and was asked multiple times to return to the facility. APD had to go inside of the facility due to a personal emergency and upon returning observed that C1 was no longer in view. Per APD, he assumed that C1 was picked up by S1.
Interviews with staff and outside sources revealed that S1 arrived at the facility between 4:50 pm and 5:00 pm to pick up C1. Upon the arrival of S1 to the facility, it was observed that C1 was not at the facility. It was assumed by APD that C1 had already left the facility with S1.
Interviews with APD, S1, and an outside sources revealed that the El Cajon Police Department was contacted and a missing report was filed for C1. Per ECPD, C1 was reported missing; however there was not a report created. An outside source contacted the ECPD within 15 minutes after the initial missing report was filed to advise the department that C1 had been located. C1 was located by S1 at the park less than one block from the facility at approximately 5:20 pm; C1 was observed to be safe.
An Interview conducted with C1 revealed that when the facility staff at the day program and the staff where they reside do not allow them to do the things they want to do; they are going to continue to AWOL. C1 disclosed that they were tired of waiting and was ready to leave the the day program on the day in question. A review of C1’s records determined that C1 is not allowed to leave the facility alone and without supervision.
The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegation that a lack of supervision resulted in AWOL. Based on interviews conducted with licensee, assistant program director, staff, a client, outside sources and record review, the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the allegation is deemed substantiated.
The deficiency is noted on the attached LIC9099-D and is cited in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. A copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) was provided to Joseph Baker, Assistant Program Director and the signature on this form confirms receipt of these rights. |