1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | [CONTINUED FROM LIC 9099]
The Complainant did not display direct knowledge of complaint subject matter; their allegations were based on what Client #1 (C1) told them. [See LIC811 Confidential Names List for a description of select person identifiers used in this report.] The Complainant claimed that Staff #1 (S1) threatened to push C1 down the steps/stairs, and that S1 had instructed another client to punch/hit C1 and tried to film it. The Complainant claimed that S1 told C1, “Shut your mouth,” at medication pass time, and “eat shit or air” and/or “eat this shit,” at mealtime(s). The Complainant claimed another staff (unspecified who) told C1, “You are not the one paying [your rent], it is the government,” and that Staff #2 (S2), Staff #3 (S3), and Staff #4 (S4) insulted C1 nearly every day.
CCLD tried but was unable to reach S1 for interview. However, no other staff or client interviews could corroborate that S1 ever threatened (or tried) to push C1 down the steps/stairs, that S1 ever instructed another client to hit/punch C1, or that S1 ever made the offensive comments which the Complainant alleged.
In their own interviews, S2, S3, and S4 each personally denied saying insulting or disrespectful things to C1. The other clients/housemates’ interviews also could did not corroborate that S2, S3, or S4 (or any other staff) said insulting/hurtful things toward C1. Interviews similarly could not corroborate that any staff chastised C1 by saying the government was paying C1’s rent.
Staff and client interviews widely corroborated that C1 was not reliably truthful/accurate in the things they said, tending to fluctuate unpredictably between being hot-tempered and being agreeable, to be domineering towards peers and staff, and to fabricate or exaggerate details to portray themselves as a victim.
Based on records and interviews, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to show that staff did not treat clients with dignity. The allegation is therefore Unsubstantiated, and no deficiency was cited for it.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Froilan Montes, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. |