1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continue from LIC 9099)
A detailed review of R1’s records indicated that R1 had a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, as well as other serious illnesses, and was experiencing chronic pain when they were admitted to the facility on August 31, 2021. In addition, R1 was under medical care by an outside medical provider. On August 30, 2021, before R1 was discharged from the hospital and placed at the facility, a referral for routine home care was established by an outside provider to treat existing pressure injuries. In addition, the attending physician ordered and initiated antibiotics to treat the pressure injuries as well as a hospital bed with a low air loss mattress. A Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) reported that R1 had an ulcer on their coccyx when they arrived at the facility. A review of records of the care and supervision provided by staff as well as the outside medical provider indicated that R1’s service care plans were coordinated between facility staff and the outside medical provider. The records review and multiple interviews with staff and outside sources indicated that medical care was executed as prescribed to meet R1’s care needs. Medical records indicated that R1 had been receiving wound care since September 20, 2021. Facility documentation confirmed that staff were rotating R1 every two hours. The physician’s progress notes indicated that R1’s wound incidence was unavoidable due to R1’s advanced age and other pre-existing health conditions. The LVN continued to provide wound care three times per week. However, despite the routine and consistent medical attention provided, on December 13, 2021, at the request of facility staff, R1 was transported to the hospital to treat a possible wound infection. R1 was discharged back to the facility on December 18, 2021, with continued home care by an outside medical provider. R1’s medical team as well as responsible parties agreed to discharge R1 back to the facility with comfort care and antibiotics. Multiple interviews with staff and outside sources and a review of records confirmed that the staff adhered to R1’s service care plan and medical treatment recommendations.
The Department has investigated the allegations and has found that there was insufficient evidence to corroborate the above allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. Therefore, these allegations are deemed to be unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver, Guizar and Administrator, Tapia, and a copy of this report, Confidential Name List (LIC 811), along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. |