1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was alleged that Licensee did not ensure food was of sufficient quantity: LPA and outside agency direct observations revealed that meal portions provided to residents met or exceeded nutritional requirements as per regulatory standards. There was no evidence suggesting systematic deficiencies in the provision of food.
It was alleged that Staff 1 (S1) yelled at clients: Interviews with client and outside agency did not corroborate allegations of staff yelling at clients. Testimonies uniformly indicated respectful interactions between staff and residents, with no substantiated incidents of verbal abuse or mistreatment. LPA interviewed Client 2 (C2) who stated that S1 was always nice with C2. C2 stated that they would talk about C2's issues. C2 stated that S1 never yelled at C2.
It was alleged that the facility was not maintained in clean condition: LPA on-site inspections as well as outside agency inspections revealed that the facility was consistently maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. There were no observed lapses in cleanliness that would substantiate the allegation.
Interview with outside agency (OA) revealed OA has never seen the facility dirty or in disrepair, on the contrary OA has always seen the facility clean and in good condition. OA stated that they have never observed the facility lacking food for clients or having an insufficient amount of food for the clients in care. OA stated that they have never witnessed or heard of any clients having any unexplained bruises or injuries. OA further stated that they have overheard facility staff speaking to clients in a firm manner, but never in a verbally abusive or aggressive manner.
LPA interviewed Administrator who stated that the facility staff do not curse or verbally abuse any clients. Administrator stated that the clients have the option of making their own meals or eating the food that the facility staff prepares. Administrator stated that staff never deny or withhold food from any clients and their is always a sufficient amount of food in the facility.
Based upon the foregoing, the above listed allegations are unsubstantiated. This finding means that the preponderance of the evidence standard has not been met and the allegations are not valid.
An exit interview was conducted with Roger Villalobos. A copy of this report along with licensee rights (LIC 9058, 3/22) was provided to Roger Villalobos whose signature below verifies receipt of these rights. |