1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued from LIC9099, Page 1)
Interviews with outside sources confirmed that there was an investigation performed by California Department of Pubic Heath (CDPH) into the reporting parties allegations. Outside Source 1 (OS1) stated that the hospice provider Resident 1 (R1) was receiving treatment with was investigated by the CDPH and allegations with identical claims were found to be unsubstantiated based on the evidence of the investigations. Additionally, OS1 stated there was another investigation performed by a nurse investigator who included a review of the facility and found the claims were unsubstantiated as well. Outside Source 2 (OS2) told the LPA that "without evidence of significant overdose or allergic reaction, it would be difficult to establish a causal link between Guaifenesin (Mucinex) dosage and death in a 99-year-old resident."
Records Review revealed that the death certificate of R1 listed the cause of death as Organ Failure, with Cardiac Disease as a contributing factor. The circumstances noted do not indicate an unnatural or questionable death. This corroborates outside source interviews.
Based on interviews and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
On 04/02/2026 it was alleged that "Staff did not ensure medications were dispensed as prescribed" The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, outside sources, and records review.
Regarding the allegation, "Staff did not ensure medications were dispensed as prescribed," it was alleged that facility staff did not follow the prescribed directions of administering decongestant Mucinex to R1.
Interviews with facility staff revealed that R1 was not taking the medication outside of the recommended dosage or outside of the attending physician's orders.
(Continued on LIC9099C, Page 3) |