1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (continued from LIC9099)
Regarding the allegation lack of supervision resulted in staff not ensuring client is accorded personal privacy. More specifically, staff do not protect Client #1(C1) from intimidating stares, verbal interactions, and close proximity with C2. According to interviews with C1, C2 does not touch them or try to enter their room. C1 interview further reveals C2 only tries to talk to them when they enter a public space within the facility. According to interviews with staff, all clients have the right to move freely in the facility, which includes moving in and out of the bathroom and all common areas. They further explain that they can supervise all interactions in the common hall as well as the living room and kitchen.
Records review, LPA observation, and staff interviews reveal that staff accommodate different behaviors and maintain a functional household, consider a flexible approach to house rules, emphasizing respect, clear communication, and balance between rules and individual needs. The Department has investigated the aforementioned allegations. Based on interviews, LPA observation and review of facility records, LPA found insufficient evidence to prove the allegations occurred as reported. The preponderance of evidence standard was not met; therefore, the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Jerlyn Capito, to whom a copy of this report and Licensee/Appeals Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) were provided. |