1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | [CONTINUED FROM LIC9099]
CC further reported that C2 complained about feeling unsafe in the facility and not having enough supervision. C2 also mentioned being allergic to a food that was served to them daily, as well as being fed only once per day. CC mentioned that C2 suggested that the emergency services were called so often was due to staff not wanting to assume responsibilities for the residents. LPA visited the facility on 12/30/2025, and 1/30/2025, however C2 was not able to be interviewed. LPA conducted a third visit on January 30, 2026 at which point C2 was interviewed.
During the first two visits, LPA interviewed a resident (C1) and staff (S1, S2, S3) as well as the facility manager (FM1). During these visits, it was confirmed that FM1 went on vacation during the month of December, however, both staff and clients mentioned that at least two staff members were always at the facility. When asked by LPA, C1 denied concerns regarding supervision, food service and safety.
During the interview with S1 and FM1 it was reported that C2 felt frustrated towards the other clients. Per the interviews, C2 has an outgoing personality and requires constant attention, and when they try to reach out to the other clients, they become frustrated when they don’t interact with them as much as C2 would like.
On January 30th, 2026, LPA interviewed C2. During the interview, C2 admitted to feeling frustrated with the other residents due to the difficulty in communicating with them and the lack of interest they showed in the same activities C2 wants to engage in. When asked about the other residents C2 said "they are deaf, they are no fun.” C2 then said, "that is why I have to call to the doctor, I need to get out of the house because it is too boring".
C2 shared that they were feeling unsafe in the facility, and the reason they provided was feeling depressed. Regarding their diet, C2 admitted being allergic to an ingredient, but then clarified that staff knows better and never feeds it to them.
Based on records reviewed, LPA observations, and interviews conducted with the victim, clients, and staff, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, and the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited in accordance with the California Code of Regulations.
Report and Appeal Rights discussed with and provided to Caretaker Enrique Cruz. Signature below confirms receipt. |