1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Records review indicate R1 was monitored by facility staff daily and on February 6, 2024 facility staff notated that R1 ate well and took all of R1's medications with no issues to report. On the same day, R1 was found on R1's bathroom floor and was transported to the hospital.
Interview with Memory Care Director(MCD) revealed they are in close contact with R1's responsible party due to the recent changes R1's Primary Care Physician had made. MCD stated that most of R1's medication's were changed, as a result, R1 has been much more confused and agitated. MCD stated that R1 has also been falling more. MCD stated that R1 returned from the hospital both times with no new orders. R1 was given a walker due to R1 being "more unstable." MCD stated that R1's responsible party is working directly with R1's physician to the "fix" R1's medications.
LPA interviewed R1's responsible party (RP) RP stated that the hospital staff advised RP of bruising that was found on R1's body. RP stated that R1 was transferred to a different hospital after the initial hospital R1 was sent to. RP stated that R1 was given a suction catheter and a full catheter at both hospitals. RP stated that R1 was seen pulling at the catheter tubes. RP advised hospital doctor of the various catheters that R1 was given for over three days and questioned if that could have been the cause of the bruising. RP stated that the hospital doctor stated that "it made sense" and agreed that the catheters could have been the cause of the bruising that was found on R1.
Interview with Executive Director (ED) revealed R1 often gets confused and needs to be redirected and as a result constant staff attention is paid to R1. ED stated that facility staff follow R1's care plan which states that R1 needs constant observation. ED stated that although the staff to resident ratio is not 1:1, the facility staff are still able to monitor R1 closely. ED further stated that often times R1's behaviors or refusals are the cause of R1's incidents and facility staff are constantly trying to figure out ways to better assist R1.
Based upon the foregoing, the above listed allegation is unsubstantiated. This finding means that the preponderance of the evidence standard has not been met and the allegation is not valid.
An exit interview was conducted with Calais Anguiano. A copy of this report along with licensee rights (LIC 9058, 3/22) was provided to Calais Anguiano whose signature below verifies receipt of these rights.
|